Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter, retrospective, real-world experience with 200 cases outside of controlled clinical trials.

In the ELOQUENT-3 trial, the combination of elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (EloPd) proved to have a superior clinical benefit over pomalidomide and dexamethasone with a manageable toxicity profile, leading to its approval for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. We report here a real-world experience of 200 cases of RRMM treated with EloPd in 35 Italian centers outside of clinical trials. In our dataset, the median number of prior lines of therapy was two, with 51% of cases undergoing autologous stem cell transplant and 73% having been exposed to daratumumab. After a median follow-up of 9 months, 126 patients had stopped EloPd, most of them (88.9%) because of disease progression. The overall response rate was 55.4%, a finding in line with the pivotal trial results. Regarding adverse events, the toxicity profile in our cohort was similar to that in the ELOQUENT-3 trial, with no significant differences between younger (<70 years) and older patients. The median progression-free survival was 7 months, which was shorter than that observed in ELOQUENT-3, probably because of the different clinical characteristics of the two cohorts. Interestingly, International Staging System stage III disease was associated with worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio=2.55). Finally, the median overall survival of our series was shorter than that observed in the ELOQUENT-3 trial (17.5 vs. 29.8 months). In conclusion, our real-world study confirms that EloPd is a safe and possible therapeutic choice for patients with RRMM who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.

Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended 3-year follow-up of a multicenter, retrospective clinical experience with 319 cases outside of controlled clinical trials.

The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloRd) enhanced the clinical benefit over Rd with a manageable toxicity profile in the ELOQUENT-2 trial, leading to its approval in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The present study is a 3-year follow-up update of a previously published Italian real-life RRMM cohort of patients treated with EloRd. This revised analysis entered 319 RRMM patients accrued in 41 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 6-55), 236 patients experienced disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18.4 and 34 months, respectively. The updated multivariate analyses showed a significant reduction of PFS and OS benefit magnitude only in cases with International Staging System stage III. Major adverse events included grade 3/4 neutropenia (18.5%), anemia (15.4%), lymphocytopenia (12.5%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%), while infection rates and pneumonia were 33.9% and 18.9%, respectively. No new safety signals with longer follow-up have been observed. Of 319 patients, 245 (76.7%) reached at least a partial remission. A significantly lower response rate was found in patients previously exposed to lenalidomide. In conclusion, our study confirms that EloRd is a safe and effective regimen for RRMM patients, maintaining benefits across multiple unfavorable subgroups.

Successful recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia after receiving baricitinib, tocilizumab, and remdesivir. A case report: Review of treatments and clinical role of computed tomography analysis.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic, threatening global public health. In the current paper, we describe our successful treatment of one COVID-19 pneumonia patient case with high mortality risk factors. Our experience underlines the importance of the use of a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in order to achieve a favorable clinical outcome. Further, enhancing the capability of the COVID-19 diagnosis with the use of the chest imaging modalities is discussed.

Assessment of vulnerability measures and their effect on survival in a real-life population of multiple myeloma patients registered at Marche Region Multiple Myeloma Registry.

UNLABELLED: Multiple myeloma (MM) therapy should be tailored according to patient characteristics although we do not know which ones to use. By studying the characteristics of 266 real-life patients, we found performance status (PS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) as factors affecting survival of MM patients regardless of their disease characteristics. This study might help to select patients for tailoring therapy in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a typical disease of the elderly but how many and which patients can be considered 'vulnerable' and how this may affect patient outcome remain unsolved issues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 266 symptomatic MM patients registered at Marche MM registry from 2007 to 2010 were evaluated retrospectively. Vulnerability was defined as age > 75 years, PS (World Health Organization) ≥ 2, renal insufficiency (RI), bone fracture, cytopenias, and CCI score ≥ 1. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used to assess survival and associated factors. A vulnerability score (VS) incorporating significant vulnerability features was pursued to predict survival. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of patients were older than 75 years, 39% had PS = 2-4, 35% had at least 2 cytopenias, 40% had bone fracture, 14% RI, and 51% had CCI score ≥ 1. Cox regression selected international staging system (ISS) = III (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6; P = .033), PS = 2-4 (HR = 2.5; P = .007), and CCI = 1-3 (HR = 2.1; P = .028) as factors associated with a worse overall survival. A VS including PS and CCI predicted median survival of 27 months in the 63 patients having a VS = 2 (both PS = 2-4 and CCI = 1-3) versus not reached (NR) in the 203 patients with VS = 0-1 (HR = 4.0; P < .0001). In younger patients multivariate analysis selected ISS = III (HR = 5.2; P = .006) and VS = 2 (HR = 5.5; P = .024) as factors associated with shorter survival whereas only VS = 2 (HR = 3.5; P = .002) affected worse survival in elderly. CONCLUSION: Such VS proved to be a powerful prognostic factor for survival of MM patients and it might be useful to identify true vulnerable patients regardless of age.

Tailored therapy in an unselected population of 91 elderly patients with DLBCL prospectively evaluated using a simplified CGA.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are a heterogeneous population; clinical trials have evaluated a minority of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-one elderly patients with DLBCL received tailored treatment based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Three groups were identified: I, fit patients; II, patients with comorbidities; III, frail patients. Group I received 21-day cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-21), group II received R-CHOP-21 with liposomal doxorubicin, and group III received 21-day cycles of reduced-dose CHOP. Fifty-four patients (59%) were allocated to group I, 22 (25%) were allocated to group II, and 15 (16%) were allocated to group III. RESULTS: The complete response (CR) rates were 81.5% in group I, 64% in group II, and 60% in group III. With a median follow-up of 57 months, 42 patients are alive, with 41 in continuous CR: 31 patients (57%) in group I, seven patients (32%) in group II, and four patients (20%) in group III. The 5-year overall survival, event-free survival, and disease-free survival rates in all patients were 46%, 31%, and 41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis selected group I assignment as the main significant prognostic factor for outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This approach in an unselected population of elderly DLBCL patients shows that treatment tailored according to a CGA allows the evaluation of elderly patients who are currently excluded from clinical trials.

Thalidomide, dexamethasone, Doxil and Velcade (ThaDD-V) followed by consolidation/maintenance therapy in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma.

In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), three/four-drug combinations as induction therapy seem to be more effective compared with two-drug associations in terms of response rate and duration of remission. Moreover, there is an emergent body of evidences that consolidation/maintenance therapy improves the quality of response and remission duration. However, the impact of these strategies in relapsed/refractory MM (r-rMM) is still unknown. This phase II study explored the four-drug combination of thalidomide, dexamethasone, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (pLD), and bortezomib (ThaDD-V) as induction followed by consolidation therapy based on bortezomib-dexamethasone and thalidomide-dexamethasone and maintenance therapy with thalidomide in r-rMM patients. The primary end points of this study were best response and toxicity of the planned therapy. Forty-six patients were enrolled. At the end of therapy, the best response was as follows: 37% complete response (CR), 34.5% VGPR, and 4.5% PR with an ORR of 76%. Patients receiving ≤ 2 prior regimens had a CR rate significantly higher than those heavily treated (41% vs 0%; p=0.010). With a median follow-up of 31 months, median time to progression (TTP) and OS were 18.5 months and 40 months, respectively. By a 6-month landmark analysis, patients who completed the protocol had a significantly longer TTP compared with those who did not because of toxicity (not reached vs 7 months; p<0.0001). After the dose intensity of bortezomib was reduced due to an excess of peripheral neuropathy (PN), grade 3 PN occurred in 7.5% of patients. ThaDD-V followed by consolidation-maintenance therapy seems to be very effective in patients with r-rMM provided that this procedure is used early on relapse when very deep responses seem to be the rule.

Infectious complications in patients with multiple myeloma treated with new drug combinations containing thalidomide.

The literature provides scant data concerning infectious complications and their effect on the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with new drug combinations. Despite no substantial myelotoxic effect, thalidomide increases the risk of severe infections in patients with MM. We studied 202 patients who received regimens containing thalidomide in order to assess the time, type, outcome, and factors affecting development of severe infections, role of antibiotic prophylaxis, and effect of severe infections on final outcome. Thirty-eight patients (19%) developed a severe infection early during induction therapy and most infections were pneumonia. Only one patient died due to septic shock during neutropenia. No significant differences were reported in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients developing a severe infection and those who did not. Multivariate analysis determined a monoclonal component >3 g/dL and platelets <130 ,000/µL as factors associated with increased risk of severe infection. Primary antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased the probability of severe infection only in patients having both the above risk factors. Patients with MM receiving thalidomide combinations with high tumor burden are at high risk of developing severe infections and require primary antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas in other patients it is questionable. However, patient final outcome was not affected by infection development.

Melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide versus thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin regimen in very elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a case-match study.

The outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) aged over 75 years remains poor, and the best therapeutic approach has still to be defined. We compared the response, toxicity, and outcome of 34 very elderly patients with MM receiving thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD) to those of 34 patients matched for age, International Staging System (ISS), and creatinine who received melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT). ThaDD resulted in a significantly higher response: > or =PR (87.5% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.009) and > or =VGPR (55.5% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.03). No statistical differences were detected in terms of median probability of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two treatments. Patients treated with MPT had more neutropenia, neuropathy, and heart toxicity, whereas thromboembolism resulted more frequently in patients receiving ThaDD. Therapy discontinuation occurred in 9% and 14.5% of patients treated with ThaDD and MPT, respectively. ThaDD can be considered a therapeutic option in very elderly patients with MM since it induces a faster and deeper response than that obtained with MPT, having similar safety profile.

ThaDD plus high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation does not appear superior to ThaDD plus maintenance in elderly patients with de novo multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVES: With the aim to address the issue whether high-dose therapy (HDT) is required after new drugs combinations to improve outcome of elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, we compared the toxicity and the outcome of ThaDD plus maintenance to those of ThaDD plus HDT-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS: Sixty-two patients not eligible for HDT receiving six courses of ThaDD regimen plus maintenance with thalidomide were compared to 26 patients eligible for HDT treated with four courses of ThaDD followed by melphalan 100-200 mg/m(2) and ASCT. The two groups were matched for the main characteristics except for age favouring the HDT group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Complete remission (CR) obtained with ThaDD plus maintenance was 24% whereas it was 57% after ThaDD plus HDT-ASCT (P = 0.0232). However, after a median follow-up of 36 months, median time to progression (TTP) and progression free survival (PFS) of the group of patients undergone HDT were not significantly different to those of patients receiving ThaDD plus maintenance (32 vs. 31 months: P = 0.962; 32 vs. 29 months: P = 0.726, respectively). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 49% in the first group and 46% in the latter one (P = 0.404). As expected, a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infections, mucositis and alopecia were observed in the ThaDD plus HDT group. Our results suggest that in elderly MM patients ThaDD plus HDT, albeit significantly increases CR rate, seems to be equivalent to ThaDD plus maintenance in terms of TTP, PFS and OS. These results challenge the requirement for HDT consolidation in this subset of patients.

Thalidomide-dexamethasone versus interferon-alpha-dexamethasone as maintenance treatment after ThaDD induction for multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicentre, randomised study.

Maintenance therapy was explored in multiple myeloma (MM) patients after conventional thalidomide, dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD). Patients with newly or relapsed MM obtaining at least minor response after 6 ThaDD courses, were randomised to receive alpha-interferon (IFN) 3 MU 3 times a week or thalidomide 100 mg daily until relapse. Both groups also received pulsed dexamethasone 20 mg 4 d a month. Fifty-one patients were randomized in the IFN-dexamethasone (ID) arm and 52 in the thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) arm. The characteristics of two groups were similar. A significantly better 2-years progression-free survival (PFS; 63% vs. 32%; P = 0.024) and overall survival (84% vs. 68%; P = 0.030) was observed in the thalidomide arm. In high-risk patients and in those achieving less than very good partial response after induction, TD fared better in term of PFS. Main side effects were peripheral neuropathy and constipation in TD group, fatigue, anorexia and haematological toxicity in ID arm. There was a 21% probability of discontinuation at 3 years in the thalidomide arm and 44% in the IFN arm (P = 0.014). Low-dose thalidomide plus pulsed low-dose dexamethasone after conventional thalidomide combination-based therapy was also feasible in the long term, enabling significantly better residual disease control if compared with a standard maintenance therapy.

Serum C-reactive protein at diagnosis and response to therapy is the most powerful factor predicting outcome of multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide/ anthracycline-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on factors affecting outcome in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with thalidomide-based therapy. We investigated factors affecting response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with MM treated with the thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD) regimen with the aim to select patients benefiting more from this therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with MM were treated first line with the ThaDD regimen. We analyzed demographics and disease-related characteristics to search for factors affecting response (> or = very good partial remission [VGPR] vs. < VGPR], PFS, and OS. RESULTS: Overall, 45 patients (68%) showed response > or = VGPR; median TTP and OS were 23.5 months and 35.5 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis selected only serum C-reactive protein (sCRP) as a predictive factor for response (P < .0001). By multivariate analysis, normal sCRP level (P = .001) and response to treatment > or = VGPR (P = .007) were found to be associated with longer PFS. The factors that remained significantly associated with a longer OS when assessed by multivariate analysis were normal sCRP level (P = .005) and response to therapy > or = VGPR (P = .019). CONCLUSION: Serum C-reactive protein before therapy and response after therapy are the only factors useful in identifying patients benefiting from anthracycline/thalidomide-based therapy.

Technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy is sensitive and specific for the staging and the follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma: a multicentre study on 397 scans.

We evaluated the additional benefit of Technetium(99)-sestamibi (99mTc-MIBI) scanning in comparison with standard X-ray techniques for multiple myeloma patients either at diagnosis or during follow-up. Between February 2001 and January 2005, 397 whole body scans were acquired. On 229 scans performed at diagnosis, 146 (64%) were positive and 81 cases have discordant X-ray results. The sensitivity of 99mTc-MIBI and X-ray were 77% and 45% respectively. As a result of 99mTc-MIBI, 40% of asymptomatic myeloma patients were up-staged. The positivity of 99mTc-MIBI correlated significantly with all of the most relevant clinical and biological parameters. Multivariate analysis selected only high reactive C protein (P = 0.0005), bone marrow infiltration (P = 0.02) and bone pain (P = 0.002) as factors affecting 99mTc-MIBI pattern. In 22 patients with solitary myeloma, 99mTc-MIBI was positive in 86% of cases and detected more disease sites than X-ray. Among 168 scans performed during follow-up, 99mTc-MIBI presented high specificity in patients showing a complete response (CR; 86%), and correlated with myeloma activity and with response to therapy. At multivariate analysis, a positive pattern correlated with bone marrow infiltration (P = 0.002) and disease status other than CR (P = 0.03). We conclude that 99mTc-MIBI scanning is an additional diagnostic tool with a high specificity for the staging and the follow-up of multiple myeloma patients.

Thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD) for patients older than 65 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

We present the results of a phase 2 study using thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD) in the treatment of 50 patients older than 65 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Thalidomide 100 mg was administered orally at bedtime continuously, dexamethasone 40 mg was administered orally on days 1 to 4 and 9 to 12, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on day 1 over the 28-day cycle. Response was assessed according to the EBMT criteria. Seventeen (34%) patients achieved CR, 7 (14%) nCR, 5 (10%) VGPR, 15 (30%) PR, and 5 (10%) MR, resulting in an ORR of 98%. Only 1 patient (2%) presented progressive disease. Time to progression (TTP), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) projected at 3 years were 60%, 57%, and 74%, respectively, and these parameters were significantly higher in those patients achieving a response of at least VGPR versus those who did not. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic adverse events were constipation (10%), fatigue (6%), tremors (4%), mucositis (4%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (2%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 12% of patients. Grade 3 and 4 infections and thromboembolic accidents were observed in 22% and 14% of patients, respectively. In the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, ThaDD is a very effective regimen with manageable toxicity.

Low-dose thalidomide with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicenter, phase II study.

The aim of this prospective, multicenter, phase II study was to investigate the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) 40 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days, dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. on days 1-4 and 9-12 and thalidomide 100 mg daily in 50 patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Twenty-six percent of patients achieved a complete response, 6% a near complete response, 6% a very good partial response, 38% a partial response, 16% a minor response and 8% progressed, for an overall response rate of 92%. The median event-free survival was 17 months and the median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity occurred in 12% of patients, thromboembolic disease in 12% and severe infection in 16%. The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, dexamethasone an thalidomide is safe and very effective in advanced multiple myeloma.

Thalidomide plus oral melphalan compared with thalidomide alone for advanced multiple myeloma.

Thalidomide, the prototype of a new class of agents active against multiple myeloma (MM), exerts synergistic/additive effects when combined with other drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and efficacy of thalidomide alone and in combination with oral melphalan. Patients with advanced MM received 100 mg/day oral thalidomide escalated weekly up to 600 mg/day (n=23; T group), alone or with 0.20 oral mg/kg/die melphalan administered monthly for four consecutive days (n=27; TM group). A>/=50% paraprotein reduction was observed in 59% of TM compared with 26% of T patients (P=0.009); three TM patients were found to have an absence of paraprotein by immunofixation. After a median follow-up of 13 months (range 6-32), progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was significantly longer in the TM group (61 versus 45%; P=0.0376), whereas overall survival did not differ significantly. Toxicity was not significantly greater with the combination therapy; although DVT was more frequent (11 versus 4%), as was grade 3 leukopenia (30 versus 13%; P=0.073), there were no cases of severe infection. Thalidomide administered with oral melphalan improved response rates and PFS in patients with advanced MM without significantly increasing severe toxicity.

Common and rare side-effects of low-dose thalidomide in multiple myeloma: focus on the dose-minimizing peripheral neuropathy.

OBJECTIVES: Thalidomide has demonstrated a remarkable efficacy in the treatment of multiple myeloma but its use may cause several toxicities. We have investigated the common and rare side-effects, especially analysing peripheral neuropathy, in order to optimise the thalidomide dose for minimizing this harmful side-effect. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients were treated with thalidomide alone or combined with oral melphalan. The median age was 69 yr. The initial dose of thalidomide was 100 mg/day increasing weekly by 100 mg increments until a maximum dose of 400 mg was attained. Melphalan was administered at a dose of 0.20 mg/kg/d for 4 d every 28 d. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-fourth of patients discontinued thalidomide because of toxicity. Constipation (71%), somnolence (36%) and fatigue (20%) were the most common side-effects and they were not dose dependent. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 39% of patients and a thalidomide median daily dose of more than 150 mg was significantly associated with higher frequency and actuarial risk of peripheral neuropathy without improving the response rate. Deep venous thrombosis was observed in 7% of patients and other side-effects were rare. In patients with advanced multiple myeloma we found that a thalidomide daily dose of 150 mg minimizes peripheral neuropathy without jeopardizing response and survival.

Salvage therapy with an outpatient DHAP schedule followed by PBSC transplantation in 79 lymphoma patients: an intention to mobilize and transplant analysis.

Chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation may be an efficient salvage treatment in malignant lymphomas. We investigated the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of an outpatient schedule of dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin (DHAP), followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell autografting as salvage treatment in patients with high grade (HG), low grade (LG) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's Disease (HD). A total of 159 DHAP courses (median: 2, range: 1-5), was administered on outpatient basis to 79 patients (31 LG-NHL, 28 HG-NHL and 20 HD), with the intention to mobilize and to transplant. A successful collection was not achieved in 40% LG-NHL, 10% HD and 20% HG-NHL patients. The risk to fail the collection was significantly related to the number of previous chemotherapy courses (>6) (P = 0.005, RR = 1.4), to the pretransplant status (P = 0.04, RR = 13.5) and to the previous fludarabine administration (P = 0.01, RR = 20). High dose therapy (HDT) was feasible in 60 patients (76%). The overall treatment related mortality was 3.8%. The overall response rate (ORR) was 81% with a 57.6% overall survival (OS) at 62 months (95% CI: 45-69.3%) and a progression free survival (PFS) of 42% at 74 months (95% CI: 26.7-58%). The diagnosis of HG-NHL and the non-response to DHAP resulted to reduce respectively the OS (P = 0.007, RR = 2.8) and PFS probability (P = 0.01, RR = 4.1). In conclusion this outpatient schedule of DHAP is a well tolerated, efficient salvage and mobilizing regimen not only in HG-NHL, but also in LG-NHL and in HD. Randomized studies are needed to better define the role of DHAP in LG-NHL and HD patients.

Long-term hematologic reconstitution after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: a comparison between controlled-rate freezing and uncontrolled-rate freezing at 80 degrees C.

BACKGROUND: The most widely used system for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) cryopreservation is controlled-rate freezing (CRF). Uncontrolled-rate freezing (URF) at -80 degrees C has also been used, but its clinical impact has not been studied sufficiently yet. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two groups of patients were compared: Group A consisted of 69 patients autotransplanted with PBPCs cryopreserved with CRF; Group B consisted of 192 patients autotransplanted with PBPCs cryopreserved with URF at -80 degrees C. The same cryoprotectant solution and storage system were used. RESULTS: A significant delay of hematologic reconstitution (HR) in the URF group was observed for neutrophils greater than 0.5 x 10(9) per L and for platelets greater than 20 x 10(9) per L and greater than 50 x 10(9) per L; we did not observe any differences in the clinical course. The long-term HR was comparable in the two groups, all patients showed stable engraftment, and no late graft failures were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that URF is safe and allows sustained long-term engraftment without increasing the risks of transplantation, even though the early engraftment after URF is slower.